Ultra-Processed Foods and Health Risk: Scientific Evidence and Trends

Jessica Attie | New York Times
Oct 25, 2025By Jessica Attie | New York Times

"How America Got Hooked on Ultraprocessed Foods"

New York Times | By: Jessica Attie - October 25, 2025

Introduction

Humans have processed food for millennia—from fire-cooked meat to ground grains and preserved goods. By the late 1800s, industrial food production introduced formulations fundamentally different from traditional preparation methods.

👉 Processing often disrupts naturally occurring phytochemical systems, including flavonoids and polyphenols →

Coca-Cola (1886), Jell-O (1897), and Crisco (1911) marked the early transition, followed by highly engineered products such as Spam, Velveeta, Kraft Mac & Cheese, and Oreos. By the mid-20th century, increasing workforce participation and time constraints accelerated reliance on industrial food systems.  

In the 1950s and ’60s, more women began working outside of the home but were still expected to feed their families.

1970s-1990s - An Ultraprocessed Food Explosion

This shift reflects a fundamental change in how food is structured, moving away from whole botanical inputs toward highly engineered formulations designed for stability, palatability, and scale.

👉 These patterns are directly addressed within botanical formulation systems that aim to restore metabolic balance through structured plant-based inputs →

👉 The complete article can be accessed here: How America Got Hooked on Ultraprocessed Foods

### Scientific Context

This article is grounded in applied botanical systems research and connects to the following peer-reviewed and technical publications:

👉  Botanical Alternatives: Toward Safer, Evidence-Based Gold Recovery

👉  Glycine–Thiosulfate Hybrid System

👉  Mercury Replacement Strategy (ASM)